Effects of sport on children
Effects of sport on children
In the morden life, the children not only go to school to study but also go to different education centers to learn a number of things such as foreign languages, soft skills, music and so on. These lead to a result that they do not have enough time to do sports. In fact, many of their parents seem to forget the important role of playing sports with children. Hence, this writing aims to discuss some following effects of sports on children.
Firstly, playing sports is one of the best way to keep children in good health. In fact, when doing sports, they have to do different actions in the long time. These activities make their body burn a certain number of calories. Consequently, children will feel better and eat more after playing sports. Therefore, these feel affect positively on their health if they keep doing sports every day.
Secondly, sports can keep children in improving their mind. They have to make effort as most as possible to win partner when they doing sports. They also have to pay attention on the game until they finish it. Hence, playing sports not only helps children improve their health, but also make train their mind.
Finally, playing sport is a good way to train team working skill for children. In the numerous of sports, players have to combine others as a team, such a football. In the game, all of members of the team attempt to understand people gaverate the best result as possible. Therefore, children will improve the ability to connect with others.
In conclusion, according to above positive effects of sport, we can reveal that playing sports is necessary to the life of children. The parent should arrange the time to play sport with children. Besides, motivating children to enroll sport teams at school is a good way for children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t skills, music and so on. These lead to a result that they do not have enough ti...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, as for, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 5.60731707317 375% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1505.0 965.302439024 156% => OK
No of words: 314.0 196.424390244 160% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79299363057 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.73543355544 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36691917513 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 106.607317073 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496815286624 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 283.868780488 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 1.53170731707 522% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 8.94146341463 224% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4938762681 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.25 112.824112599 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7 22.9334400587 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.1 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 3.70975609756 404% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458297032063 0.215688989381 212% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161052067317 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.146848358377 0.0843802449381 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.395093221362 0.15604864568 253% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.305072305316 0.0819641961636 372% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.54 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.