Effects of tutoring program for college students
Some people believe that having tutors is necessary for college students whereas others claim that students should study independently instead of receiving help from private teachers. From my point of view, to succeed in academic studying, learners should hire a trainer for three reasons: to understand difficult academic contents, find out a new research direction and achieve good marks on the exams.
The first benefit of having a tutor is that students can overcome problems of academic lessons. For instance, mathematics usually too difficult for most students; thus, if they do not understand previous lessons, they cannot catch up with later ones. Therefore, they ask tutors for explaining difficult content more clearly; as a result, students can overcome difficult studying stages and get more success.
Another positive point of receiving supporting from tutors is that students can find out research fields which are suitable with their ability. Many learners get trouble in choosing what to study because they have a lack of experience in recognizing gaps in researches. Hence, they have to ask tutors who have a lot researches for help.
Finally, the most important reason for getting tutors is strong desires to achieve high results in the exams from students which bring many good opportunities for seeking a job. They ask trainers for help to review lessons before each exam in order to have deep comprehension of subjects.
In summary, tutors can help students comprehend strongly class lessons, recognize appropriate research topics and gain good marks in the exams. However, students should not depend totally on private trainers but get used to studying independently.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, so, therefore, thus, whereas, for instance, in summary, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 265.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39245283019 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68414115529 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 106.607317073 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577358490566 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 283.868780488 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7441202302 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.083333333 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28079800465 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115604987376 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721619039295 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169451592472 0.15604864568 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327432824744 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.