The graph compares China and the USA in terms of their birth rates during the period from 1992 to 2000.
It is obvious that both nations had significant changes in the fertility during that time, with lows in the 1940s and highs in the 1950s.
From approximately 10% in 1920, the birth rates in China fluctuated and reached 15% in 1935, then decreased rapidly to 5% in the 1940s. The next 5 years saw a increase in the birth rates, to the peek of 20% in 1950, followed by a period of decline.
The birth rates in the USA also fluctuated in the same time, from around 11% to 13% between 1920 to 1935, before went down quickly from 1935 and dropped to only 5% in 1945. Over the following 5 years, the rates raise slowly and got the highest at 1950, which was 15%. The latter half of the century, the fertility rates in the USA reduced to roughly 7% in 2000.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...o 5% in the 1940s. The next 5 years saw a increase in the birth rates, to the pee...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 700.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.29447852761 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.15238646879 2.65546596893 81% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558282208589 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 189.0 283.868780488 67% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.648122804 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229661555027 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10593976487 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808964504712 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143245797396 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0876248056213 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.97 61.2550243902 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.5 10.3012195122 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.9 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.