The graph below shows the number of passengers railway journeys made in Great Britain between 1950 and 2004/05.
The rendered line graph depicts the information about the numbers of travellers by railway in three different networks such as national rail, London underground, light rail and metro system s in UK from 1950 to 2004/05.
Overall, high number of people choose national rail network. Whereas, least number of people traveled in light rail and metro systems.
A glance over the graph immediately reflects, national rail was at peak in 1950 with 1000 million passengers, which showed a fluctuation and decreased til the mid 1989s and accounted for underneath 750 million travellers. Although, London underground started from nearly 750 million and hits it's bottom in 1980, after that it upsurged significantly until 1990/91.
Turning towards rest of the description, it is wothmentioning that the number of people preferred nearly as national rail network as London underground aftet 1980s to 2004/05. However, at the end of the given time period national rail was above nearly 100 million travellers than London underground. Light rail and metro systems start their services in mid 1960s, within next twenty years its usage was negligible. In 2004/05, number of passengers was highest as compared to its rest of the year.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 69, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...le choose national rail network. Whereas, least number of people traveled in light rail...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32989690722 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75836296856 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603092783505 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8144043638 43.030603864 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.888888889 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15535432523 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747059482034 0.103423049105 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0730468587379 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102807160881 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0503756617213 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.