The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country.
The rendered line graph depicts the information about four distinct recycled materials such as paper and cardboard, glass containers, aluminium cans and plastics between 1982 and 2010.
Overall, recycling of paper and cardboard was highest. Whereas, least percentage of plastics was recycled than others in the given time period.
A glance over the graph immediately reflects, in 1982, 50% glass containers was recycled, which was 15% less than paper and cardboard, after that paper and cardboard showed fluctuation till 1994 and then it decreased to 70% in 2010. However, glass containers represented quit opposite trend, firstly it declined to 40% in 1986 and then it upsurged moderately till 2010. Amazingly, there was only difference of 10% between paper and glass containers in the last year.
Turning towards the rest of the description, it is interesting to note, aluminium cans and plastics showed a upward trend in the given years. Aluminium cans increased nearly 8% in each year and its recycled percentage was just beyond 40 in 2010. Recycling of plastics was stated in 1986 which was almost negligible anyhow its percentage was raised by 10% in 24 years.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ing of paper and cardboard was highest. Whereas, least percentage of plastics was recyc...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 63, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the least'.
Suggestion: , the least
...paper and cardboard was highest. Whereas, least percentage of plastics was recycled tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ote, aluminium cans and plastics showed a upward trend in the given years. Alumin...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, then, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25531914894 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72020257281 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563829787234 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5063252364 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.777777778 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15887092758 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710995522402 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0555335325682 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11134691787 0.15604864568 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613859577447 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.