The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries.
The line chart illustrates the percentage of the population aged 65 and over from 1940 to 2040 in Japan, Sweden and the USA.
Looking at the information more detail, we can see that Sweden and the USA seem to have a similar trend from the beginning of 1940 until the end of the 1990s. In 1994, approximately 7% of male and female aged 65 and over while just under 10% in the USA. This uptrend increased constantly by 1980s before and decreased slightly in the next decade. Sweden experienced fluctuation after the 1980s and has been predicted the percentage of elderly will reach just over 25% in 2040s. By contrast, from the beginning of 21 century, the USA reach a plateau period in the next two decades and has been expected the proportion of elderly will increase significantly at the end of the 2040s at nearly 23%.
On the other hand, Japan indicates a completely different trend compared to the other two nations. The figure started at 5% in the 1940s and a slight fall occurred by the end of 1980s. After that, the figure increased all the way in the 2030s and is predicted it will rise dramatically at the end of 2040s (about 27%).
Overall, it is clear that although in some period the percentage of elderly dropped, it is an increasing tend at the end of the period especially the change in Japan.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 469, Rule ID: IN_1990s[1]
Message: The article is probably missing here: 'in the 2040s'.
Suggestion: in the 2040s
...age of elderly will reach just over 25% in 2040s. By contrast, from the beginning of 21 ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'century' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'centuries'.
Suggestion: centuries
.... By contrast, from the beginning of 21 century, the USA reach a plateau period in the ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1089.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61440677966 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58159018268 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512711864407 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 321.3 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1131691378 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.119725378242 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0540608682212 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827871205717 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0946016591577 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108568720875 0.0819641961636 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.