The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The Pie chart below depicts the causes for the less production of agricultural land. While, the table demonstrates the reasons for degradation in the North America, Europe, and Oceania during the 1990s. Over-grazing was the top most cause of land degradation worldwide and the Europe had maximum degraded land among the three.
Over-gazing caused greater than one-third of the total land degradation globally. It was followed by deforestation, over cultivation and other causes with a percentage of 30, 28 and seven respectively. However, among the three given areas, the Europe had the highest non-productive land of 23%, The main contribution to this was from deforestation. The Oceania was second, with the uncultivated land of 13%, however, the main reason for it was the same as the cause for worldwide degradation. Opposite to these, the North-America had the highest productive land with a degraded land of only five percent, which was almost totally caused by over-cultivation.
To sum up, over-cultivation was dominant cause for global land degradation. However, the major reasons in various region of the globe were different.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 9, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'charts'.
Suggestion: charts
The Pie chart below depicts the causes for the less p...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aximum degraded land among the three. Over-gazing caused greater than one-thir...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st totally caused by over-cultivation. To sum up, over-cultivation was dominant...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'while', 'to sum up']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.253658536585 0.268076937826 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.0926829268293 0.116061578633 80% => OK
Adjectives: 0.107317073171 0.0759168565197 141% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0439024390244 0.0366838410393 120% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00975609756098 0.0131127313244 74% => OK
Prepositions: 0.141463414634 0.155750635184 91% => OK
Participles: 0.019512195122 0.0379272487307 51% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.24624320369 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0146341463415 0.0210936926555 69% => OK
Particles: 0.00487804878049 0.00175180941692 278% => OK
Determiners: 0.136585365854 0.0948980150116 144% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00487804878049 0.00967000014798 50% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1149.0 1161.00487805 99% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.9 90% => OK
Chars per words: 6.45505617978 5.90752243213 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73763899035 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.370786516854 0.337110787985 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.280898876404 0.247514529752 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.207865168539 0.171178102325 121% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.151685393258 0.112407865282 135% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24624320369 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567415730337 0.546246751206 104% => OK
Word variations: 49.9302969099 49.3433353143 101% => OK
How many sentences: 10.0 8.93414634146 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.8 23.0094962315 77% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.8124974645 42.9750493124 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.9 135.714022679 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 23.0094962315 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8 0.689975730869 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.84146341463 78% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.48048780488 203% => OK
Readability: 45.8898876404 47.7609492067 96% => OK
Elegance: 2.83333333333 2.94281807926 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.579310340203 0.418131533498 139% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.174272519329 0.181151798455 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.105936934189 0.0850326197045 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.635292583244 0.706616315825 90% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.136627460224 0.157042692854 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.313408767013 0.228904883108 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168275903778 0.108899403657 155% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.536250564094 0.367819155151 146% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.117468907981 0.0812612215331 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.441625536529 0.316326947829 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.162011730029 0.0921553760075 176% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70731707317 27% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.14146341463 526% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.16585365854 32% => OK
Negative topic words: 6.0 0.956097560976 628% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 10.0 7.1512195122 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.