Digital technology helps to share daily activities on social media. Is it positive development or negative development.
Advancement in technology paves the way of information as excessive amount of current affairs related news are available on social media. While this trend has a minor negative on individuals life, it is proved to be beneficial exceedingly. Reasons behind my arguments are discussed in the ensuing paragraphs.
To engender with, certainty, owing to counterfeit news, people learn something wrong. This will harm their career, since fake news do not have a true moral itself. For example, it was posted on instagram in India that some terrorists were planning to expose a bomb in rural area of Mumbai, hence residents immediately sifted their houses and things in another area. Nevertheless, after given time period, there was not a single bomb exposed. Certainly, people devote that kind of news in order to make a large amount of followers and popularity.
Although, lone news may lead masses mind in an inappropriate way, not all posts have wrong intentions to spread fake news. Eminent users on facebook have been allocating informations about current scenario be it, Covid-19 or progression of developing country. Consequently, people who cannot afford to get news about what is going on surroundings at daily basis. For instance, prior to a week, I was reeling to an article regarding to a health crisis in the world. Over there, I read that in India, the cases of Coivd-19 are surging drastically, thus maximum care should be taken by denizens of India by the sake to maintain well-being. Later on, it resulted positive on me when I went to a crowed place, since my present over there must be required. When I tested my self whether I got covid positive or negative, results are negatives because of the usage of masks and hand sensitiser frequently. I knew this because of that news I read form google.
Moreover, similarly to previous merit to follow daily activities on social media, it would be essential to fulfil unemployment of capable masses. Since there are daily employment opportunities are being posted, individuals get to know and apply on that, ultimately they would satisfy their need to enjoy their life to the fullest. Also, evolvement of a particular nation is maintained to best as it gives a chance to cope with work to many people.
In conclusion, seeing daily news on social networks is essential when it comes to know about current scenario and know about different available jobs. However, that genres of news should be fake as it can attract people in an inappropriate way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...hile this trend has a minor negative on individuals life, it is proved to be beneficial exc...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 42, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an inappropriate way" with adverb for "inappropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...lthough, lone news may lead masses mind in an inappropriate way, not all posts have wrong intentions t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ead masses mind in an inappropriate way, not all posts have wrong intentions to s...
^^
Line 10, column 221, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an inappropriate way" with adverb for "inappropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...should be fake as it can attract people in an inappropriate way.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, regarding, similarly, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 74.0 41.998997996 176% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2101.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 419.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01431980907 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81384754281 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 254.0 176.041082164 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606205250597 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 667.8 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.138725179 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.047619048 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9523809524 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7619047619 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120504181023 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297372902068 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0434099325996 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0652426341199 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386685883495 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.