Human activity has had a negative effect on plants and animals all over the world. Some people think that it is too late to do something about it. Others think that there is still time to take effective action. Discuss both view and give your own opinion
In recent years, a great deal of attention has been paid to human activity and its negative impact on the environment. While some may view this as irreversible, others may be of opinion that we should take any action. I personally believe that there would be something possible to protect the environment.
First of all, we can expect that governments play a significant role in this field. Today it is widely known that global warming is a major factor of the extinction of many species of animals and plants. If governments introduce laws to limit emissions from factories, or, impose “green taxes” on drivers and airline companies, this will help to reduce carbon emissions that cause global warming. What’s more, individuals can also try to be greener. Nowadays the amount of household waste is more and more growing, and this waste ends up in landfill sites. If we avoid buying over-packaged products, or recycle and reuse useful materials as much as possible, this will finally lead to save wildlife habitats.
Some may think that it is in vain to protect the natural environment at the sacrifice of our daily life. There is no doubt that it is difficult to completely throw away our modern life style dominated by consumerism. The question here is, however, how we can harmonise environment maintenance and human activity. In my opinion, the answer is possible; we can choose environmentally more friendly life style of our own will as I wrote above.
In summary, even though the negative impact on the natural environment from human activity may be significant, there is still plenty of room for improvement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 12, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'thinks'.
Suggestion: thinks
... to save wildlife habitats. Some may think that it is in vain to protect the natur...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, may, so, still, while, in summary, no doubt, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1392.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13653136531 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90245270352 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619926199262 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 441.0 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7184741741 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4285714286 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3571428571 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.64285714286 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 14.0 4.38176352705 320% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.127318483667 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409168424852 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0421240744434 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0409168424852 0.151304729494 27% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0421240744434 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.