In many cities, there is little control on the design and construction of new houses, so people can choose to build houses in their own styles instead of building them with the same style as the old houses in the local area.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
In this day and age, a growing tendency towards design and construction can be witnessed in many cities. In fact, rather than sticking to shared similar architectural patterns of the local area, a large number of urban dwellers have opted for more personal designs in their newly-constructed houses. From my perspective, the disadvantages of this tendency are far weightier compared to its benefits, which will be meticulously explained as follows.
On the one hand, completing houses based on owner’s individual styles offers two major advantages. it stands to reason that this pattern of construction allows the owners to make use of their creative mind, thereby enabling the emergence of exquisite and one-of-a-kind houses which might act as appealing destinations for tourists locally and internationally. Another benefit would revolve around the boost of construction industry. If an owner is given ample opportunity to freely construct their houses, it will cater for different individual demands in terms of building materials and transportation within their budget. these factors not only seem closely linked to a growth of employment rate but also exert positive influences on the construction industry in the long run.
On the other hand, I am of the opinion that houses built according to individual taste in lieu of the overall local style present more drawbacks. Indeed, local planning might suffer given the appearance of strange-looking designs that, to a certain extent, jeopardise the conventional exterior local look. An increasing number of architecturally inconsistent houses within the same area will also be attributed to a loss of a traditional structured environment where unique characteristics have long been preserved. this is perfectly exemplified through the image of Hoi An - an old quarter known for its promising tourism potential which is currently at risk due largely to the erection of modern, French-influenced high-rise buildings. these new architectural patterns, consequently, do more harm to age-old local houses imbued with Vietnamese traditional life styles.
In conclusion, despite several merits that the construction of houses depending upon individual preferences might bring about including tourism and building industry improvement, I personally contend that this trend is more disadvantageous on account of its possible destruction of local architecture and deteriorating influences on local planning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...chitectural patterns of the local area, a large number of urban dwellers have opted for more pers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 100, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ual styles offers two major advantages. it stands to reason that this pattern of c...
^^
Line 3, column 625, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...and transportation within their budget. these factors not only seem closely linked to...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 517, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...aracteristics have long been preserved. this is perfectly exemplified through the im...
^^^^
Line 5, column 739, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... French-influenced high-rise buildings. these new architectural patterns, consequentl...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, look, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2097.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72950819672 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34745996223 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 231.0 176.041082164 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631147540984 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.89329223 49.4020404114 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.785714286 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.14285714286 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254412558365 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821364910964 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505471022264 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143084887497 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356165366794 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.0946893788 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 50.2224549098 56% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.53 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.