Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school some people believe that this has negative development while others think there are some benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school, some people believe that this has negative development while others think there are some benefits.

Discuss both views and give your opinion.

It has been observed that many masses are fond of travelling as they invest their huge chunk of time to travel, with a view to coping with activities or education curriculums. It is frequently assumed that this tendency has some merits, where as others oppose this notion. This essay not only discusses both opinions, but also elaborate on why it is splendid for denizens to travel for work or study, expect in critical situations.

To embark with, while the self-awareness level of any person is low, the level of their boredom is high. Nevertheless, for a person, it is not possible to feel bore if he travels more for either study or work. In some popular means of transport, there are miraculous individuals who can interact more with other masses. , As a consequence, masses may feel free from boredom and embark to become a creative person. Besides this, elementary masses evolved their communication traits very nicely, since they were passionate on travelling. For example, while travelling in buses, they meet abound people and they individuals have a leisure time to interacting with others. Eventually, it would be essential alternative for intermediate level people to progress communication skills and feel free from boredom while sitting in public vehicles.

However, a coin resemble two sides, similarly in case of travelling out of limited time has minor negatives. Firstly, learners or employees are not capable of calling to those relatives whether on video or audio platform, as vehicle are often crowed, so that people become less-interactive with their family. In addition, similarly to previous dreadful affect, people cannot do their work or study once they arrived at their own place. Owing to a huge chunk of time allocated on travelling, almost every masses evolve stress and fatigue in their body. As a result, over there at institute or organisation, they people should not be emphasised well as they intend to be.

In conclusion, although travelling has minimal awful impact on people health and family bonding, it is facilitate their communication traits to best and mitigate their problem of getting bored exceedingly. Thus, my notion regards to travelling does not lie in emotional threat and bespeak to others.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 238, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...med that this tendency has some merits, where as others oppose this notion. This essay n...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 322, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ho can interact more with other masses. , As a consequence, masses may feel free ...
^
Line 3, column 841, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...redom while sitting in public vehicles. However, a coin resemble two sides, simi...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 104, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'facilitated'.
Suggestion: facilitated
...people health and family bonding, it is facilitate their communication traits to best and ...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, similarly, so, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1890.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 364.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19230769231 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86302549647 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593406593407 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 2.10420841683 380% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4554157385 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.176470588 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21612558452 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0660282972641 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0425071345265 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127087337652 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053975050121 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.