Many people say that companies, factory owners and privates tour operates should pay the bills for cleaning up pollution, instead of government. To what extend do you agree or disagree.
It is undoubted that the accelerating rate of contamination has ushered in some pressing concerns for society as a whole. While I agree that organizations should be responsible for the fee that spending to protect environment, while I would argue that government should pay for environmental protection.
On the one hand, Institutions need to pay the bills to slash contaminant incidence because the industry development has a severe influence on the environment. As illustration, firms and tourism industry discharged pollutants into the atmosphere during their production processes, causing greenhouse effect and global warming. For example, companies produce a million products such as car, train or aeroplane which run on fossil fuel and release many carbonic to the atmosphere. If they do not make an effort to invest in developing fuel-efficient vehicles or eco-friendly alternatives, the ecosystem will face the risk of serious deterioration.
On the other hand, as it may seem, prolonged companies solely cannot effectively curb the alarming pollution rate. Consequently, the government also should spend money to solve environmental contamination. It means that, residents as well as firms pay taxes for the government to contribute to boost economic development, thereby government need to bring a friendly environment for the society. For instance, local authorities should give top priority to spend money on creating renewable energies like wind, hydro, solar power and developing infrastructure public to facilitate favourable to people have an environment-friendly life.
In conclusion, although I concur with the responsibility of organizations for fee of protecting environment, I would believe that the government should pay to clean up the pollution.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 263.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74904942966 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.51919165625 2.80592935109 125% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6463878327 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.8967695019 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.454545455 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.9090909091 7.06120827912 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164132608981 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575542324839 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0502425612914 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110418032096 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418078165097 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.