More and more people want to buy famous brand of car, cloths and other items.
What are the reasons?
Do you think it is positive or negative development?
What are intending to be bought is there some eminent items, be it luxurious cars or splendid clothes. This essay not only contribute causes associated with this phenomena, but also proves that why it is negative evolvement.
To embark with, certainly, with several intentions whether they are good or dreadful, people want popular items. First and foremost, masses avarice of sawing off expensive vehicles or equipments in front of the society, famous items are encouraged to consume. This would be essential to build up own personality as well. Additionally, at an online platform, modish tiding are convenient, hence individuals which ranging from teenager to older can buy that faddish items. For example, Lamborghini car worths extremely low in total amount of money on amazon online shopping centre, however not convenient at local shops.
It proved to be incorrect exceedingly when it comes for overall progress of human. For instance, if one person has not sufficient range of money to buy expensive car, then the person may start committing crimes and that probably devoid of employment. Besides this, smilier to previous negatives, recruiting highly price items is such a waste of money. Either that money can also be invested in charity works or in particular area where the scarcity paves the of poor people health. Since contribution of energetic meals, poor people can properly be fed and survived. As a consequence, they are capable of providing their best to nation development.
In conclusion, owing to availability of faddish things, it is necessary to buy them in oder to saw status. In contrast, this tendency has negative consequences, which have been mentioned above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 158, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... only contribute causes associated with this phenomena, but also proves that why it ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28413284133 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83316505934 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.686346863469 0.561755894193 122% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9396429876 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0666666667 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.06666666667 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109962029817 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319440048179 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0200005037084 0.0667982634062 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0635236144862 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104432355416 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.36 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.