Nowadays there are a large number of coffee shops and fast food vendors on high streets and in town centres Why are there so many of these outlets What effect is this having on the society

Essay topics:

Nowadays, there are a large number of coffee shops and fast-food vendors on high streets and in town centres. Why are there so many of these outlets?

What effect is this having on the society?

With increasing populations and climbing demands, as well as socio-economic conditions, the number of cafes and fast-food sellers in public areas has become noticeably big. There are multiple reasons for the opening of these outlets, and the societal impact has been varied.

To begin, the cost of living these days has become unbearable in a lot of cities, due to soaring inflation rates. Owing to such financial burdens, people have started ‘mini-ventures,’ by going to the streets to sell items, trying to earn extra money alongside their full-time jobs. The demand aspect of this is not something to gloss over; over the years, more and more people have been eating outside, spending a larger proportion on their income at these locations. Moreover, this could be attributed to the intensity and effort that goes into most day-jobs, with many unable to find the time to cook at home. Hence, these are the motivations for the supply and the demand of these businesses.

The impact of such establishments on society is a bit unclear, as compared to its causes. In my experience, times of financial instability have led to more such vendors, proving to be a sort of signal for contemporary economic conditions. Additionally, the owners of these shops cannot be blamed for making people spend money, and the consumers’ motivations are also genuine. Therefore, I do not see such activities having any effects on society, though these sellers are themselves an effect of their surrounding economic state.

In conclusion, innumerable people have turned to starting small businesses for selling food, as a way to navigate the difficult monetary situations that they are in. It is important to note that not every vendor or consumer may have the same reasons; they may be doing this out of enjoyment or as a hobby. Ultimately, this phenomenon is a ‘looking glass’ into the current socio-economic situation.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, sort of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16346153846 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99605091547 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608974358974 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.409449995 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.071428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2857142857 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180247218653 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0559646563664 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0222900334307 0.0667982634062 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100700881395 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00915801777457 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.