In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Transportation has been a great concern in several countries. Some people commend the idea of building new railway systems for fast trains among cities; whereas others suppose that it is necessary to spend money on developing current public transport. I do believe that the latter is far more convincing than the former because of several reasons.
On the one hand, constructing railway networks to link cities bring two significant benefits. Firstly, the networks with very fast trains help shorten time spent on traveling across cities. In fact, if a large amount of time can be saved, people will have more hours spent on working; therefore, work efficiency also increases significantly. Secondly, train systems assist in tackling road accidents and offenses caused by drivers and motorcyclists. Consequently, traveling from cities to cities will be safer, which results in the lower rate of road injuries.
On the other hand, improving public transport in cities is considered a better way to transform cities’ traffic. In terms of traffic congestion, a better public transport system does help a lot. In most developing nations, traffic jams are generally the result of a huge number of motors and cars traveling at the same time; therefore, mitigating the issue will dramatically benefit daily commuters in city centers. From the environment’s perspective, using public transport instead of private cars or motorbikes takes a huge part in reducing air pollution. In big cities like Singapore, Japan, Korea and the like, public transport like buses, underground trains or mass railway trains have contributed greatly in keeping the environment clean because there is just a small amount of dust or smoke released by private vehicles.
From all the above-mentioned, each opinion has its own benefits; however, spending money on renovating public transport is far more practical in today’s society. Governments in developing nations should invest more in improving the environment within big cities by making thorough action to get rid of air pollution caused by daily commuters.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, whereas, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1783.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46932515337 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00497191724 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616564417178 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5861693429 49.4020404114 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.866666667 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.13333333333 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266282156368 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0817692237869 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831210780441 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161560753817 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842676975443 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.