Over population in urban areas has led to numerous problems.
Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that government and individual can tackle them.
Current scenario, there are highly occurring threats in metropolitan side owing to an excessive amount of folks living. While some of them are silly concerned, two major problems are hazardous, be it a devoid of employment and the consumption of natural resources. In this essay, I provide explanation of how that two problem paves the way of good lifestyle of masses and also contribute some solid solution to tackle that threats.
To embark with, certainly, there are major concerns raised because of over population in city city areas. First and foremost, multitude amount of masses are reeling with unemployment problem, since there are lack of jobs available in all sectors. Exceeding availability of masses paves the way of opportunities of work for other elementary job applicants and again they have to prove their self to advanced level with a view to get job. Besides this, overpopulation led the problem of inadequacy of people well-being. In other words due to high usage of fossil fuels and cold people spread bacteria on frequently visited places. As a consequence, other individuals can easily be trapped by some griefs. For example, according to IIM survey in India almost 70% of masses have been suffering from skin disease every year because of over population.
However, these threats can be prohibited if folks implement above allocated suggestions. Firstly, one of the main applications of the denizen is to assist week individual. Hence, if more business will be established, then the possibility of acquiring a job will higher. Thus, people should embark to invest their money in small businesses as every person out of hundred is running a small business. In addition, controlling bodies should impose strict rules when it comes to driving a vehicle. Consequently, the spread of fuels and other natural resources will be slumped and people would not get hunted by hazardous virus anymore. For instance, government of India recently introduced a rule that no one below 18 permitted to drive any vehicle, thus over there in India masses do not have anxiety to break their health and invite some skin problems.
In conclusion, two serious problems due to over population can be prevented exceedingly, if people follow government rules and seeking out for someones aid.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vide explanation of how that two problem paves the way of good lifestyle of masse...
^^
Line 3, column 90, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: city
...ns raised because of over population in city city areas. First and foremost, multitude am...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 157, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...foremost, multitude amount of masses are reeling with unemployment problem, since...
^^
Line 3, column 591, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e of fossil fuels and cold people spread bacteria on frequently visited places. A...
^^
Line 5, column 50, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...these threats can be prohibited if folks implement above allocated suggestions. F...
^^
Line 5, column 821, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o not have anxiety to break their health and invite some skin problems. In co...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1927.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18010752688 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84211240138 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604838709677 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7083109078 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.055555556 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189271629667 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0511360149775 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539469693317 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123413757567 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515100466061 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.