Some cities create new housing for their growing populations by constructing a smaller number of high-rise buildings. Other cities create more of low-rise buildings. Which solution is better, in your opinion?
In order to address the shortage of housing supply, while some municipalities build detached houses, other municipalities develop condominiums. In my opinion, the latter is the more preferable solution to the problem because the former has some drawbacks as mentioned below.
One of the disadvantages of low-rise buildings such as detached houses is its limited capacity of four or five people per unit at the most. Because of this limitation, if we are going to solve the housing shortage with low-rise housing, we will have to build a large number of those houses. It goes without saying, however, that such a measure is unrealistic given the recent difficulties in local government finances. In fact, according to a study conducted by the Ministry of Public Management in Japan, the budget allocated to housing construction in every municipality has been shrinking year after year. Additionally, it would not hard to imagine that the measure will also require extensive residential site development, resulting in the so-called suburban sprawl phenomenon. One example of this is the suburbs of Tokyo, where the residents are now forced to live an inconvenient life after uncontrolled housing developments in the 1960s.
Another drawback of low-rise buildings is its difficulty in multipurpose uses. Unlike apartment complexes, low-rise buildings such as detached houses lack extra space including common areas, making it difficult to convert them to other purposes in the future. This kind of restriction on use is undesirable given that these housing units are a type of public good developed by municipalities. Indeed, in the latest national audit report, the Board of Audit of Japan criticized some detached houses constructed with governmental subsidies because of the lack of sustainability.
In conclusion, when considering the limitations discussed above, high-rise housing would be more suitable for the answer to the housing shortage problem compared to low-rise housing.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...low-rise housing, we will have to build a large number of those houses. It goes without saying, h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, kind of, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1686.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50980392157 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11135139403 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604575163399 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0599007506 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.692307692 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262600160992 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899486729981 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667458869144 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169822892647 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259076063696 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.