In some countries, a few people earn extremely high salaries. Some people think that this is good for a country, while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount of people can earn.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is indeed a fact that 'Money is not a god but is also not less than god'. Presently, two schools of thought are raised that some assert that obtaining a job with handsome salary is good for a nation. By contrast, others claim that authorities should make boundaries on the amount of money earning by people. I, firmly advocates that high salaries are lucrative for people as well as nation.
There are numerous reasons to support former view. First and the most important reason is that high paid jobs encourage more people to do study harder, not only it help them to achieve fame but also they can get name and respect in society. To be specific, nowadays, several employees of my country are working in MNCs, which helps to enhance the reputation of my country (India), as people are earning a haffty sum of money which also give a hand to them to fulfill the desires and fundamental needs of thier families.Thence, people should be proud on them instead of restricting their salaries because they are motivating more people towards study. Ultimately, it also reduce the poverty as well as illetracy rate of a nation. Besides this, employers are paid for their work as they do a lot of hardwork to reach at these positions. To demonstrate it, workers cleared a cut throat competition as well as they spend money and time to grab these jobs, which is not a cup to tea for everyone. Hence, employers are only born to do jobs related to handsome salaries.
Numerous points could be mentioned to endore latte view. To begin with, people who are getting high salaries they are spending their money lavishly. To examplify, workers of high paid salary are living a luxurious lifestyle, buying cars, arranging high-fi parites and spending astronomically on marriages, in order to show-off their status in society. Therefore, they should be paid in a limit. What is more, government authorities can avert this money in the different sectors such as they can build new schools, companies, health departments and many more things. Consequently, this will help in the development of a country.
In conclusion, after having all points into my knowledge, I, would like to reiterate that it is not a great initiative to limit the earning of workers because they are getting money of thier hardwork, struggle and work.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 312, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he amount of money earning by people. I, firmly advocates that high salaries are ...
^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'helps'?
Suggestion: helps
... people to do study harder, not only it help them to achieve fame but also they can ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 518, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thence
...and fundamental needs of thier families.Thence, people should be proud on them instead...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 670, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reduces'?
Suggestion: reduces
...ople towards study. Ultimately, it also reduce the poverty as well as illetracy rate o...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, then, therefore, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1918.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 396.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84343434343 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66958728186 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532828282828 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 593.1 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.3259148822 49.4020404114 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.555555556 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244166869418 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0698601043785 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525440291147 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142726006362 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0596355385671 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.4159519038 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.