Tourism is one of the fastest growing industries and contributes a great deal to economies around the world. However, the damage tourism can cause to local cultures and the environment is often ignored.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Tourism becomes the biggest impact for national economic, while domestic tradition and environment often be ignored since tourism becomes popular. I agree that notion, because there is no limitation for foreign people and environmental impact assessment.
Initially, foreign people restriction is important, since they bring their culture and habit. It could be a huge impact for local culture, because the huge differences between western and eastern provide ambiguity in society. Putting more simply, local culture is contrasted to western, furthermore it is not suitable to be applied in regional community, so limitation is needed to guarantee that there is no conflict between two different culture. For example, overseas people have a tendency to drink alcohol, but in Indonesian community is forbidden.
In addition, the building of tourism often tends to create a bad impact for environment because there is no proper environmental impact assessment (EPA), thus EPA is important to warranty that the organization would protect the environment when they are building the tourism. To put it simply, if there is no EPA, the company should have forbidden to build tourism, because it could be a bad impact for that. For example, in East Borneo, Indonesia, the plan to build new Indonesian capital city be predicted makes deforestation.
In conclusion, even tourism contributed to GDP’s countries, since there is no limitation for overseas people and environmental impact assessment, it could create negative impact for domestic culture and environment. Where possible, the government should makes a law for foreign people to respect local culture and the investor should be banned if they do not have EPA as a requirement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 255, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
.... Where possible, the government should makes a law for foreign people to respect loc...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hey do not have EPA as a requirement.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, thus, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49253731343 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97488933996 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.511194029851 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.332204841 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.818181818 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3636363636 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125541316128 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0535366060869 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474286011239 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920412834768 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0344054516556 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.86 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.