The chart below shows the number of male and female research students studying science -related subjects at a UK University in 2009.
The bar graph illustrates how many men and women did research on six science-related subjects at a British University in the year 2009.
Overall, amongst the six categories studied that rose significantly for men, veterinary medicine was the least as opposed to women that only had the most students. Moreover, biology was the highest subject for both sexes.
By far, science-related subjects were dominantly enrolled by males as compared to females in 2009. Pathophysiology and geology made to around 150 enrollees while physics and medicine were approximately between just above and under 200 students respectively. Although veterinary medicine was not popular that accounted for below 100 research students, Biology marked the highest data amongst the six categories for men to nearly 250 pupils.
Biology was the only subject that females attracted the most which accounted for around 200 pupils followed by medicine with just above 150. In terms of Veterinary Medicine, Pathophysiology , and Geology it had approximately a hundred ,70, and 60 research students respectively. Physics recorded only 40 female attendees in 2009.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of Veterinary Medicine, Pathophysiology , and Geology it had approximately a hund...
^^
Line 7, column 235, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...d Geology it had approximately a hundred ,70, and 60 research students respectivel...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 7.85571142285 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 24.0651302605 21% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 966.0 1615.20841683 60% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 173.0 315.596192385 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5838150289 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 4.20363070211 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11600270375 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 176.041082164 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589595375723 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 506.74238477 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6042811354 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.333333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2222222222 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11111111111 7.06120827912 30% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240001100295 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107054482132 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0951323926704 0.0667982634062 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156336888659 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0780197755014 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 78.4519038076 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.