Employers should give their workers at least one month holiday a year as it makes them to do better at their job. To What extent do you agree or disagree?
It is common believed that in order to improve the work efficiency, employees should be given one month break. In my opinion, one month break is important for every worker to release the work related mental stress and negative emotions and energies. But at the same time there are several positions in the company for which one month vacation is not possible, in that case staffs should be given another means of relax.
One of the main reasons for getting the month vacation is to release the work pressure and psychological stress. It is natural phenomena that no one can continue the work throughout the year without any break. One month vacation can help workers to concentrate more effectively on the assigned task when they return back form vacation. According to one recent research conducted by King Khalid University in Saudi Arabia, where the participants who took regular breaks from their work were observed more productive than their counterparts. Moreover breaks also good to maintain the healthy work life balance.
However, in most of the organizations, some roles are very important for day to day business operations and cannot take a continuous breaks. For instance, quality control analyst of continues process line of biscuits manufacturing company, as per job descriptions he has to remain on the line during entire shift during the operations. If he will be on one month leave the quality of the product will compromised which results loss of customers and huge financial loss. Therefore, in that case employees can be compensated small company sponsored breaks to maintain their stress and mental health level and enjoy their healthy life with their families.
In conclusion, it is important for all employees to take breaks to boost the performance level, but few roles cannot afford long vacations due to business needs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: RETURN_BACK[1]
Message: Use simply 'return'.
Suggestion: return
...ectively on the assigned task when they return back form vacation. According to one recent ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 541, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ore productive than their counterparts. Moreover breaks also good to maintain the health...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'break'?
Suggestion: break
...operations and cannot take a continuous breaks. For instance, quality control analyst ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 402, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'compromise'
Suggestion: compromise
...h leave the quality of the product will compromised which results loss of customers and hug...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 125, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to long'
Suggestion: to long
...ance level, but few roles cannot afford long vacations due to business needs.
^^^^
Line 9, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d long vacations due to business needs.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15562913907 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69695024689 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58940397351 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2337872203 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.769230769 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155872408166 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560707039628 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402013888295 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862205697469 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.052737074751 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.