These days, tourism has become one of most profitable enterprises amongst industry giants, however, it is believed that it creates more turmoil than bringing people closer to each other. Conversely, I am not convinced that this is true. While I agree that it might cause some misunderstandings, I strenuously believe it has worked as a medium to enrich understanding between people. In this essay, the reasons behind my opinion are comprehensively explained.
On the one hand, admittedly, there are some drawbacks in the flourishing of tourism. Firstly, it might cause disturbance for some people. Increasing number of visitors may interrupt the daily lives of those who live in tourist destinations, which may be the reason for escalating tension. Secondly, some behaviors are considered insulting in some countries. Take alcohol consumption as an example. In many countries drinking alcoholic beverages is averse to the local people’s religious beliefs; hence, drinking the mentioned by tourists may produce problems.
On the other hand, Tourism has undeniable prominent advantages in bringing people closer to each other. First and perhaps the most benefit is that it spreads different cultures among the inhabitants of this earth. People get acquainted with different cultures; therefore, understand each other’s customs and traditions. For example, women with Muslim ethnicity are forbidden to shake hands with men. One that has traveled to Muslim countries and is familiar with their traditions understands that it is a religious rule and is not an insult. Moreover, tourism brings people closer to each other via kindness for the unfortunate. Tourists that visit deprived countries such as those located in Africa bring international help by attracting international sympathy. As a tangible example, statistics show due to the booming of Africa-tourism from 1980 on, a lot of food has been sent to undeveloped countries that are facing with hunger.
By the way of conclusion, while there are some downsides to the international tourism, on the basis of the points made above, I am not convinced that it has created more tension than bringing people closer to each other. I firmly support the increasing rate of tourism and believe that because of it, people are more understanding and sympathetic toward others.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
conversely, first, firstly, hence, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, by the way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44077134986 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0782532354 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553719008264 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3550411022 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.75 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.15 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.7 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251135929511 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679104460872 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046918456848 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152483784488 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0663860437937 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.