The only way to solve the increasing crime rate of young offenders is to teach parents better parenting skills. To what extent do you agree?
Many argue that crime rate keep on increasing due to bad parenting. Few others feel its nothing related with the parents. In my view, I disagree with the people who are blaming parents for their child's offense. I will try to discuss both the views and conclude with preventive measures.
.
A few argue, bad parenting leads to all sorts of crimes by the younger generations. They suggest to not to leave children in their younger age's with the maids or helpers. Few suggest to not to keep their children in residential schools because this can make a child think in a negative perspective and take aggressive decisions. Along with all these activities, every school should implement a new curriculum which includes anti-crime teaching methodologies for the children to prevent crimes performed by the young people. For example, few schools India started to teach 2 lessons per language in their textbooks to prevent the crimes.
On the other side, few say, increasing crime levels by this generation kids are not due to bad parenting. They suggest the idea of not to provide mobiles to the child until they reach the age of puberty. They should seriously restrict the child in playing games related to crimes and killings. Such games can bring a child horrific thoughts and behave wildly. For instance, one of my friends daughter started to play a game called Blue Whale which is truly realistic. Being in that transistion, within three weeks she murdered one of her friends as per the game rules and got arrested.
To conclude, I believe its not ethical to blame parents for the crimes convicted by their children. Addressing issues and better teaching methods in their home as well as in school helps to reduce the level of such incidents.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...nd conclude with preventive measures. . A few argue, bad parenting leads to a...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, well, for example, for instance, as well as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1459.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92905405405 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57642868835 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574324324324 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 429.3 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5223934863 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.8235294118 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4117647059 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70588235294 7.06120827912 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128635554242 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0430729258941 0.084324248473 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474689065371 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.086607226698 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326271384984 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.0946893788 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.