People should focus more on solving problems related to the future, and should not spend time thinking about the past.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
These days, an ample emphasis has been placed on tackling the challenges that may emerge in the future. Thence, it is claimed that people should stop thinking too much about the past. Instead, it is more lucrative to endeavor to solve problems of the future. While the mentioned notion has some merit and one should not be stuck in the past, I strenuously believe in the past should not be abandoned.
On the one hand, focusing on problems to come is advantageous. First and perhaps the most prominent benefit of this is that if more effort is put into solving a problem in the future, society will be ready when the problem surface. For example, if proper predictive measures were investigated in advance, the drought of 1940’s which claimed the life of 10 million people would have been averted. Secondly, paying more attention to the future will not only prevent disasters to harm present generation, but the future of the posterity will also be secured. To elaborate, many inventions may be considered extravagant and impractical these days, but they may ease the life of our children. For instance, in 1915’s, the automobile was a luxurious invention that a scarce number of people could afford. Nonetheless, inventors saw the imperative potential of it to solve the limitation of transport, which benefited the later generations.
On the other hand, as the quote says ‘He who does not know the history, is condemned to repeat it’, not thinking and knowing about the past can have irreversible consequences. Whereas by thinking about the mistakes that were made in the past, one can discover the flaws and avoid the repetition of the same mistake. Moreover, many problems have been seeded in the past and have not emerged yet. Therefore, by taking a look at the past these can be identified.
To sum up, based on the aforementioned explanations, I believe there should be a balance between focusing on the future and examining what happened before.
Comments
1. Some duplicated contents,
1. Some duplicated contents, for example, since we have 'On the one hand, focusing on problems to come is advantageous.' ,
then we don't need:
' First and perhaps the most prominent benefit of this is that if more effort is put into solving a problem in the future,'
we can make it simper, like:
On the one hand, focusing on problems to come is advantageous. First, society will be ready when the problem surfaces. For example, ...
------------------
2. where is the content for 'paying more attention to the future will not only prevent disasters to harm present generation'? in the second paragraph? the example 'is just for the future of the posterity will also be secured.'
-------------------
3. 'not only...but also...' is not used correctly:
'Secondly, paying more attention to the future will not only prevent disasters to harm present generation, but the future of the posterity will also be secured. '.
check out books how to use 'not only...but also...'
-------------------
4. other minor issues like: a lot of 'in the future' or 'about the past'
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, look, may, moreover, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00909090909 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81379423848 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557575757576 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5256542482 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3125 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8125 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260895536511 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844381313899 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689156094551 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16123601684 0.151304729494 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0820900753647 0.056905535591 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.