In recent years, many small local shops have closed because customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.
Is this a positive or a negative development?
These days, people have a tendency to shop in large malls instead of local stores. As a result, the latter enterprises have faced bankruptcy. It can be asserted that this trend has been both positive and negative. This essay seeks to investigate both perspectives, followed by a comprehensive deduction.
On the one hand, there are a plethora of prominent advantages in connection with this development. First and foremost, shopping from large shopping centers is more convenient and less time-consuming. To elaborate, all demanded items are gathered in one place and the need for visiting a variety of different shops is eliminated which saves time and makes shopping easier. For instance, one has the ability to purchase a diverse range of merchandise from canned soups to a chainsaw. Moreover, there are easier to go to. There are a lot of parking spots available around the malls; hence, the challenge of finding parking spots on busy streets in order to shop from small stores is tackled once and for all. Last but not least, the items in large shops are cheaper. To justify, studies conducted by various sources show the products that are on sale in large shopping centers such as Walmart are 5 percent cheaper than local shops.
On the other hand, the aforementioned trend has a number of drawbacks. Firstly, it is believed that the products in large shops have inferior quality compared to small local shops. For example, one can find a better quality meat in local butchery than malls which usually sell frozen meat. Secondly, due to this development, local businesses have deteriorated; and thence, it is harder for people to achieve success in the competitive market. This has had an irreversible negative psychological and financial effect on hard-working people who were or are forced to close their shops.
To recapitulate, On the basis of the points mentioned above, it can be concluded that people have drifted toward shopping from large shopping malls which has irrefutable benefits such as being more convenient and more economical. However, these places, offer products of lesser quality and have deteriorated local businesses.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, for example, for instance, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1806.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84678694643 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551428571429 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 572.4 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7164331486 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0526315789 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4210526316 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63157894737 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318580219896 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919795754844 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701529426374 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192535065355 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018149889984 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.