The science improvement may allow human alive more than 100 years or even 200 years. Some people's opinion is the good thing for all of the people but others argue it that is bad. Therefore, it is highly debatable so I will examine it in this essay.
First and foremost, individuals will likely to have more time to do anything that they want. For instance, it is to spend leisure time to build more skills such as creative skills, computer and social media skills or even artistic skills. With all these new skills, people can gain extraordinary life and enjoy a different lifestyle. Another significant argument in favour is that some genius scientists would have a chance to bring human to a new era such as discover a new planet that suit for people settle there, through new research that makes people avoid any disease in the world. If Einstein were lived more years, we might be gain an amount of improvement in science or technology.
In contrast, the world's workforce has not reached the target that could afford more people live here. If fewer people is dying without any new extent space that could detrimental people who live on the earth now. The world population is increasing but we are still facing poor condition in some countries such as food and water shortage.
In conclusion, it is true for a human to have more lifetime soon but it is better to remain this topic for the future to explore. I will keep my opinion as a neutral.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... than 100 years or even 200 years. Some peoples opinion is the good thing for all of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 129, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e peoples opinion is the good thing for all of the people but others argue it that is bad....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ence or technology. In contrast, the worlds workforce has not reached the target th...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, still, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1199.0 1615.20841683 74% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64728682171 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42554225134 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.604651162791 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8936776688 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2307692308 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8461538462 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225204162735 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0804321763444 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616677077096 0.0667982634062 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148588517601 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0952419858822 0.056905535591 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 50.2224549098 121% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 12.4159519038 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 78.4519038076 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.