It is true that there are many people suffering from problems because of having a great deal of fast food in a few countries. It is for the governments to request a higher tax on this sort of food. Therefore, I strongly disagree with this opinion. This essay will express it.
First and foremost, it is hard for some people to spend their leisure time to cook at home. If the governments asked for higher tax on fast food, the price of fast food would increase a lot. Some people have to cook at home in unnecessarily. They do not have enough time to rest and relax. It will cause some problem, such as an unhealthy body to influence co-workers, even occur unsafety work environmental. Furthermore, some low-income people cannot afford the meal because the price increased. It will cause a social problem. For instance, crime on the street will be growing and growing. On the one hand, the taxpayer would unhappy about this. On the other hand, society is instability in the country.
Another significant argument in favor is that health problems are one of the results of having fast food. It is not the solution to request high tax from a fast food company. For example, The resident of Belgium eat a wide range of chips, but they have most of the healthy body in Europe because of workout a lot to reduce the weight. It is for the governments to concentrate on informing people to more exercise and treat themselves well.
In conclusion, I disagree with the opinion to ask for more tax on fast food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s opinion. This essay will express it. First and foremost, it is hard for some ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, sort of, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.63197026022 5.12529762239 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68909198618 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53531598513 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.9542911405 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.2222222222 106.682146367 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9444444444 20.7667163134 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374166846433 0.244688304435 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10795341379 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889178373663 0.0667982634062 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241209206535 0.151304729494 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392095291215 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.0946893788 60% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.19 50.2224549098 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 11.3001002004 57% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.98 12.4159519038 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.58950901804 89% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.