To build metro lines and the train is the way for some people to suggest the government on how to spend their budget to reduce road congestion. Others believe to build a wide range of roads is the solution to it. It is for many residents care about it, especially the taxpayer, so it becomes a controversial topic nowadays. I will examine the point of both sides, and will, give my opinion.
The positive of building underground or train is the service will use a specific route to run for the business which creates a new transposition for people to travel around. There should be fewer people to spend time on the road and the government is likely to build more lines in the urban area if people were traveling by the new method frequently. It has some negative of building sperate lines service, which is the construction of subway costs long period work and the budget will be increased hugely. Another consequence of this is cause more traffic congestion because of the worksite on the road. In addition, the entrance of the metro is usually far away from the resident's area and people need more time to the station by walk. That is inconvenient for disabling and seniors. Another significant argument in favor is that geography situation could be an inevitable reason to derive the higher budget to restructure the plan.
It is advantages for government in the city to build new and more roads in order to reduce the transport efficiency. From people's perspective, the time they saved can be concentrated on their study or work.
In conclusion, no matter government fund which solutions in urbanization, less time cost and problem-solving efficiency is the key of consideration. I will tend to agree that build more road is the better way, but train or underground service is doable in some richable budget city.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'residents'' or 'resident's'?
Suggestion: residents'; resident's
... the metro is usually far away from the residents area and people need more time to the s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1516.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82802547771 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82125343995 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528662420382 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.4143491709 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.066666667 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9333333333 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.6 7.06120827912 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.347061675558 0.244688304435 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108859237025 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104723259043 0.0667982634062 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204560071853 0.151304729494 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068113718609 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.