Some people think that having a high number of young people graduating from universities is beneficial for a country. Others, however, believe sending a high number of young people to university leads to high levels of graduate unemployment.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
It is often thought that youngsters acquiring tertiary education could prove to be fruitful for the nation whereas some think that rise in young students receiving higher education could results in rise in unemployment rates. In my opinion, although highly qualified youth could be as asset to the society but myriad drawbacks in terms of unemployment and other socio-economic issues can be witnessed.
Attaining university education aids the people in getting an influencing job out-and-out. A masters degree in engineering which a student receive could be fruitful for the industry or academic institutes. For instance, an M.Tech graduate has vast knowledge as compared to under graduate students. hence, could aid in bringing laurels for the industry as well as country.
On the contrary, copious graduations in particular field of study could have detrimental effects on employment scenario. The countless university pass-outs could not have job as it could not have job as it could be a herculean task for limited number of organizations to bestow employment for everyone of them; thereby augmenting the gap between job and education. Besides, job they could get might not be sufficient to enable them to earn bread and butter for the family. So number of jobless graduates enhancing at a vast pace.
In conclusion, it can be advocated that imparting quality and higher most education to the mundane strata could help a nation to reach the pinnacle of success. yet a balance between industrial demand of manpower and university output as educated youth should be maintained for the holistic developments of country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...udents receiving higher education could results in rise in unemployment rates. In my op...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Tech
...academic institutes. For instance, an M.Tech graduate has vast knowledge as compared...
^^^^
Line 2, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...as compared to under graduate students. hence, could aid in bringing laurels for the ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in particular field of study could have detrimental effects on employment scenar...
^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...ess university pass-outs could not have job as it could not have job as it could be...
^^^
Line 3, column 197, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'jobbed'.
Suggestion: jobbed
...could not have job as it could not have job as it could be a herculean task for lim...
^^^
Line 4, column 160, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Yet
...ation to reach the pinnacle of success. yet a balance between industrial demand of ...
^^^
Line 4, column 315, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r the holistic developments of country.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, if, so, well, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, as well as, in my opinion, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29457364341 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9616461429 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585271317829 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.1581966907 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.833333333 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 7.06120827912 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173003331192 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648806829223 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371341749302 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0971993816561 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356521944029 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.