Traffic congestion is a serious problem in many countries around the world. Describe the situation in your home country and suggest some solutions.
Traffic jam is a major phenomenon in most cities, especially, it has become worse for developing countries. In Vietnam, a city such as Hanoi is not immune to the fundamental challenges of traffic congestion. This essay will look at the reasons and propose some measures.
One of the critical causes of traffic congestion is that roads are too narrow and poorly built. Most of the streets were built in many last decades, where they used to accommodate mainly bicycles, motorbikes, and just a few cars. As these cities grow in an ad-hoc manner, no provision is made towards scaling road capacities. Furthermore, the city has been explosive growth in its vehicular population. Consequently, there are more and more several bottleneck roads. To tackle this problem, the government should invest more in enhancing modern traffic facilities, encouraging the usage of public transit as much as possible, and releasing limitate regulations of private vehicles.
Another factor is the bad attitude of drivers. They seem not to be well-trained to follow lane discipline, particularly at peak hours, which worsens the already overcrowded junction situation. Moreover, it was observed from most of the main roads that the various shops, offices, and spiritual places along it had either lack of space or inadequate parking lots. As a result, customers tend to park cars along the shoulders of the road causing a further jam. Issuing harsh punishment for offenders is apparently needed, and the forward way might be to give an incentive for drivers to follow the rules.
To sum up, economic growth and excessive vehicles have led to massive matters with traffic. The practical actions mentioned above should be taken with the view to improve the situation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, furthermore, look, moreover, so, well, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1466.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19858156028 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82286431653 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677304964539 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0474062815 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.625 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.625 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0691302374905 0.244688304435 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0199630977138 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0250635514887 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0399446963098 0.151304729494 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0290395931101 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.