In the present, all countries around the world are exploring the way to develop their technology. It is hard to keep the life of traditional skills. I strongly agree that it is not necessary to save it. Therefore, I will express my ideas in this essay.
Firstly, most of the new skills are the improvement skills of old-timing. It is rare to find the skills that are from none to brand new. In other word, disappearing skills are out of time in some way, which transfer their tradition type into a new style. Moreover, Find the beneficial side of traditional skills is the function of create skill. For instance, typing is a skill that allows people who can have a job in the last century. Today, as the hi-tech improve, people could use voice input the article with fewer mistakes, the new invent also allow the employee to input the text through the small machine. From a social perspective, gain better results with the same skill but different function.
Secondly, fast-paced technology is encouraged by people who have the ambition to achieve the new target. Those countless goals force people to run with time, the only thing that people can do is send the ancient skills to a museum for display.
Finally, the skills of ancient time are unsuitable nowadays, time-waste minimization is really important, we count on us.
In conclusion, we, the people who have no chance to look back. What people to do is move forward with well developed new skills. Then the future of humanity is limitless.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, look, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1250.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.80769230769 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59825840623 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.603846153846 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1499014356 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.5294117647 106.682146367 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2941176471 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208564625025 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0677748412048 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534075963456 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107075373437 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751038604383 0.056905535591 132% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.0946893788 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 50.2224549098 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 11.3001002004 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.03 12.4159519038 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.