The reading material points out several reasons why four-day workweek is beneficial to the economy and the companies and employees. However, the lecture are against the idea of the reading material by refuting every point it raises.
To begin with, the reading material believes that this new workweek can increase the profits of the companies because the employees will become more alert and make less mistake. However, the professor argues that the company profits will probably not increase. For one thing, the money spent on employees' health profits does not change with the new workweek. For another, hiring more people will definitely increase the costs because more office space and equipment like computers will be needed, thus cutting the profits.
In addition, the reading passage claims that the four-day workweek will make the rate of unemployment decrease because some of the work will be shifted to other people. The lecture, however, poses that the rate of unemployment will not decrease. Because the process of hiring new employees are costly, the company may tend to make present employees overwork instead of hiring new people. Besides, the company may also raises their expectations of people who work four days a week and wants them to what they used to do in five days. So no new jobs will be created and the present employees will become unpleasant.
Furthermore, the reading passage says that the new workweek will improve the living quality of the employees because they will have more time to stay with their family and do what they are interested in. The professor, on the contrary, believes that the phenomenon will not take place because the stability of their jobs will decrease and they may be easier to lose their jobs. If they don't overwork. Besides, their chances of getting promoted will be tiny if they don't work five days a week because the company wants five-day worker to be in the management position to ensure consistence of continuous supervision during the entire week.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ease. For one thing, the money spent on employees health profits does not change with the...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 120, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e rate of unemployment decrease because some of the work will be shifted to other people. T...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... they may be easier to lose their jobs. If they dont overwork. Besides, their chan...
^^
Line 7, column 387, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...y be easier to lose their jobs. If they dont overwork. Besides, their chances of get...
^^^^
Line 7, column 466, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...f getting promoted will be tiny if they dont work five days a week because the compa...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, in addition, for one thing, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 5.04856512141 357% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 30.3222958057 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07507507508 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45600119132 2.5805825403 95% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486486486486 0.540411800872 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 518.4 419.366225166 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7302069753 49.2860985944 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.666666667 110.228320801 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2 21.698381199 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06452816374 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367648143692 0.272083759551 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126300723572 0.0996497079465 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628677686064 0.0662205650399 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221342844253 0.162205337803 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818375546987 0.0443174109184 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.3589403974 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.2367328918 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 63.6247240618 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.