Governments should allocate sources prior to the technology research, do you agree or disagree? Give your own experience and example.
The controversial topic with respect to technology research never fails to attract public attention. There has been a heated debate on whether governments should allocate sources prior to the technology research. As far as I am concerned, I tend to be the advocate regarding this issue.
It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that technology research bring more advantages to us due to the fact that people can not live without technology. The first point with regard to this is that because of technology research then people's life are changing a lot and feel more convenient than before. Smart phone would be a convincing example, smart phone can get into internet directly and people can get information quickly then can save more time to do other things. As a result, technology research should put in the first place because it can bring benefits to human.
In contrast, it is commonly believed as a fact that governments should pay more attention and money to education. Admittedly, it is manifest that education is important to the society. Nevertheless, this argument does not hold water. It should be pointed out that technology can bring more benefits than education. That is to say, many technologies can use in education and can make education easier.
In a nutshell, due to the fact mentioned reasons, we may safely to reach the conclusion that governments should allocate sources prior to the technology research. Despite the fact that education is important, technology research can bring more benefits and make education easier.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 155, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n a heated debate on whether governments should allocate sources prior to th...
^^
Line 1, column 163, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed debate on whether governments should allocate sources prior to the techn...
^^
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on whether governments should allocate sources prior to the technology res...
^^
Line 1, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r governments should allocate sources prior to the technology research. As...
^^
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nments should allocate sources prior to the technology research. As far as...
^^
Line 1, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts should allocate sources prior to the technology research. As far as I a...
^^
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould allocate sources prior to the technology research. As far as I am con...
^^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate sources prior to the technology research. As far as I am concerned, I te...
^^
Line 7, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to reach the conclusion that governments should allocate sources prior to th...
^^
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the conclusion that governments should allocate sources prior to the techn...
^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...usion that governments should allocate sources prior to the technology res...
^^
Line 7, column 132, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t governments should allocate sources prior to the technology research. De...
^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nments should allocate sources prior to the technology research. Despite t...
^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts should allocate sources prior to the technology research. Despite the f...
^^
Line 7, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hould allocate sources prior to the technology research. Despite the fact t...
^^
Line 7, column 160, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ate sources prior to the technology research. Despite the fact that educatio...
^^
Line 7, column 228, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that education is important, technology research can bring more benefits and mak...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, then, in contrast, as a result, with regard to, with respect to, in the first place, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 6.10837438424 262% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1307.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14566929134 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86750692156 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515748031496 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2440928065 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3571428571 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1428571429 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2857142857 7.25397266985 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 17.0 5.33497536946 319% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228193707357 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0915193517469 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100321069021 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167166356168 0.151781067708 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0683302606442 0.0609392437508 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 59.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.