The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
The tables depict information about the sales of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in five different countries in Europe (UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium, and Sweden) from 1999 to 2004.
Overall, the UK and Switzerland were the two countries that on top of coffee and bananas sales while Sweden had the least sales in both products.
In the first table, it can be easily seen that Switzerland had the highest sales of coffee which doubled than that of the UK. In 2004, each of the countries had an increase in sales. While Belgium and Sweden's sales raised slightly from 1999 to 2004, that of the UK and Switzerland had a dramatic increase. Especially, the UK whose sales increased more than 10 times in 2004.
In the second table, Switzerland had a high sales of bananas than other countries at 15 million Euros in 1999 and the number of it raised to 47 million Euros at the end of the period. While Switzerland, the UK, and Belgium's sales had a rapid increase, Denmark and Sweden experienced a different trend, a decrease. Denmark had a dramatic drop in bananas sales which was about a half decrease in 2004.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76288659794 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72915631403 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469072164948 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8482230731 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.23603664747 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318267088334 0.215688989381 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156444078515 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135250358938 0.0843802449381 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254884008366 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.152873115118 0.0819641961636 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.