Recently, the phenomenon of migration to some specific countries in the 18th century because of industrial developments and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of improved lifestyle is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that lowering related problems is a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, immigration to industrialized countries can provide the community with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that higher income, as well as a better future perspective, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered a high rate of crime and murder in developed countries. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both prosperity and criminal activities apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of culture, mingling people with different cultural backgrounds in bug cities might increase the consequences of psychological problems. Moreover, fundamental aspects of technological progress relate to this reality that the demerits of leaving hometowns pertain to cultural interactions. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of problem-solving.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of migrations to developed countries in the 18th century due to industrialization far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of landing to a new country prove the significance of seeking a better life, but also pinpoint happiness implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1489.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72692307692 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.45086173956 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680769230769 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 472.5 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3024382158 50.4703680194 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.363636364 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227376348191 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662887403046 0.0925447433944 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05641994339 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113041961903 0.151781067708 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352672394331 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.03 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.