Does video conferencing with doctor help patients to cure any disease discuss the pros and cons?
The importance of video conferencing which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of video conferencing has sparked the controversy over the potential impact on patients over the years. It can be said that new technology played an essential role in every field. This essay will elaborate how video conference aids patients and how this can lead to certain problems and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why video conferencing with doctor is an important to cure from any diseases, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it can act as a life saver if we can conduct video conference as doctors can give a solution to the helpless patients in need preventing a potentially dangerous situation and give an opportunity to an individual to live more. For example, medical research proved that 70% people are taking benefits from video conferencing due to severe emergencies. Hence, it has become an integral part of treatment.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of video conferencing, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that unfortunately, medical cure cannot be conducted through video conference because doctors cannot assess the vitals of a patients by relying just on the images and even If they do the probability of suggesting an inaccurate treatment due to inadequate details is relating high. So, video conference cannot prevent from bigger which is only possible in person.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that video conference is prominent, although the way people are getting a myriad of benefits from it should not be overlooked.
Does video conferencing with doctor help patients to cure any disease discuss the pros and cons?
The importance of video conferencing which was always debatable has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of video conferencing has sparked the controversy over the potential impact on patients over the years. It can be said that new technology played an essential role in every field. This essay will elaborate how video conference aids patients and how this can lead to certain problems and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why video conferencing with doctor is an important to cure from any diseases, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it can act as a life saver if we can conduct video conference as doctors can give a solution to the helpless patients in need preventing a potentially dangerous situation and give an opportunity to an individual to live more. For example, medical research proved that 70% people are taking benefits from video conferencing due to severe emergencies. Hence, it has become an integral part of treatment.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of video conferencing, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that unfortunately, medical cure cannot be conducted through video conference because doctors cannot assess the vitals of a patients by relying just on the images and even If they do the probability of suggesting an inaccurate treatment due to inadequate details is relating high. So, video conference cannot prevent from bigger which is only possible in person.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that video conference is prominent, although the way people are getting a myriad of benefits from it should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1547.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20875420875 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95470612626 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56228956229 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 126.550809709 50.4703680194 251% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 140.636363636 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.18181818182 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.461089295714 0.242375264174 190% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209538102788 0.0925447433944 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.212002699199 0.071462118173 297% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298590558923 0.151781067708 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.202672423485 0.0609392437508 333% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 53.1260098522 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.