Recently, the phenomenon of medical facilities and schools in the rural area and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that working out of cities is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that sending doctors and teacher to remote villages can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, asking educated citizens to go to rural areas can provide the society with some noticeable impacts which are rooted in the fact that moral sense, as well as academic requirements, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered political decisions. Thus, beneficial ramification of both public schools and medical centers apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of education, choosing our workplace freely might increase the consequences of general restrictions. Moreover, fundamental aspects of free will relate to this reality that the demerits of forcing individuals pertain to improving community standards. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of governmental funds is correlated negatively with expanding infrastructure. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of limited authority.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of asking doctors and teachers to work in rural regions for a limited time far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of social demand prove the significance of rigid rules but also pinpoint Afree will implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1509.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56826568266 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18968206939 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.671586715867 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0432237189 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.75 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16454419138 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483282144709 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398769449295 0.071462118173 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0889766201784 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443014811847 0.0609392437508 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.2 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 55.0591133005 202% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.