More information available online. So, library books are useless. Do you agree or disagree with the statement?
The importance of library books, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of getting information online has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on library usage. It can be said that in the tech-savvy era myriad people prefer to read online rather than reading library books. This essay will elaborate how e-books provide more flexibility and how it makes people unhealthy and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why advancements in technology has given myriad benefits to reader, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that e-books are more convenient than the physical one due to cheaper and easier to carry, which gives more fruitful benefits to reader. For example, it saves people’s precious time and they can read anywhere, anytime due to accessibility of books at the touch of a button through the internet. Hence, it has become an elixir for reducing paper production, which is not possible without cutting the trees.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of reading books online, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that it makes people unhealthy owing to read through screen, which effects on eye sight and some specialized books are only available paperback format. For instance, not only it makes error owing to technology fault and virus, but also people may lose their favorite e-books. So, it has some negative effects as well.
What has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of e-books has prominent and highly rewarded experience, although the way it’s convenience should not be overlooked
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 249, Rule ID: EYE_BROW[1]
Message: This word is usually spelt together: 'eyesight'.
Suggestion: eyesight
...o read through screen, which effects on eye sight and some specialized books are only ava...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, look, may, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27598566308 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7360092445 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584229390681 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 79.9390263506 50.4703680194 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.818181818 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137619589394 0.242375264174 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0498653667283 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0311535376682 0.071462118173 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0745140217306 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333762881254 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.