Nowadays, people spend too much time at work to the extent that they hardly have any time for their personal life. Discuss work life balance.
The effect of long working hours at workplace, which is always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of spending less time for personal life has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on person's health and family over the years. It can be said that nowadays it is difficult to get time for personal life, which makes imbalance between office work and for personal necessities. This essay will elaborate how it can lead to health problems and how it disrupts of families and personal relationships and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons how it effects on health, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that working long hours make people less productive as well as tired, which increase the risk of illness and also fail to concentrate on work that also decrease the work efficiency. For example, research has approved that people working long hours are suffered from heart diseases and dementia because of sedentary activities which lead to health problems. So, spending long hours at work not only increase health problems but also decrease the work capacity.
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that when people spend more time at work, and families suffer. Family separation can be reason for that and also children suffer because parents they don't have time for kids because of busy schedule. For example, research has given evidence that parents who work for long hours their children's study effect a lot because children can't concentrate. Thus, family breakage is also another reason for working longer hours.
What has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of working longer hours is prominent and it increases the health risk and also family disturbance should be well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 247, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...r the potential impact of this trend on persons health and family over the years. It ca...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 441, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... work and for personal necessities. This essay will elaborate how it can lead to ...
^^
Line 6, column 207, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...so children suffer because parents they dont have time for kids because of busy sche...
^^^^
Line 6, column 387, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ens study effect a lot because children cant concentrate. Thus, family breakage is a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1550.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14950166113 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56749809063 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508305647841 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 55.1603722492 50.4703680194 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.166666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0833333333 20.9669160288 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316639703581 0.242375264174 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133667441308 0.0925447433944 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0679457435774 0.071462118173 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183574728559 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075901705931 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.1260098522 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.9458128079 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.