The only thing that interferes my learning is my education- Albert Einstein. Discuss the statement and give your opinion.
The effect of education on one's learning, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of one's learning has sparked the controversy over the potential impact on people's learning. It can be said that education provides us basic fundamental to excel in a field, however, according to Einstein, education also tends to restrict our creativity and imagination. This essay will elaborate how education impacts one's intellectual ability of learning and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons ways how traditional education system accelerates the development of our learning aptitude, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that academic education provides the opportunity to the individual to gain knowledge on a particular field. As an illustration, people who have studied and gained knowledge through academic education are usually more learned than those who do not go through this process. So, it is elixir to have certain type of course framework.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly over whelm the potential influence of academic education, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that not only does academic education restrict student's creativity as the system requires a student to follow some particular set of books to pass the exam, but it also destroys their enthusiasm to become job ready in the process. For example, students who study to pass the exam only, were proven to be unsuccessful in their professional career. Hence, it hinders someone's future career growth.
From what has been discussed above, it can be said that the impact of education in learning is prominent although the way it restricts one's learning ability to do something unique should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...roversial. The substantial influence of ones learning has sparked the controversy ov...
^^^^
Line 10, column 136, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...prominent although the way it restricts ones learning ability to do something unique...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, for example, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37282229965 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94514346406 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.8352832906 50.4703680194 196% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.181818182 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.18181818182 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123437327056 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459652846343 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0348058848697 0.071462118173 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080585746235 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0323423995496 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.