Should companies need to involve employees in the decision-making process? To what extent do you agree or disagree
Should companies need to involve employees in the decision-making process? To what extent do you agree or disagree
The importance of involving employees in the decision-making process, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of involving employees in the decision-making process has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on companies over the years. It can be said that employees should be involved in companies decision-making process, however, it also has some drawbacks as well. This essay will elaborate how engaging employees can lead to a myriad of benefit due to employee’s intellectual skills and experience and how it affects company’s information due to involvement of various people in decision and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why employees should be engaged in company’s decision making, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that every individual has their own creative mind and various skills and they can give sometimes valuable asset to companies by expressing their ideas. For example, people from business study, experience can give appropriate ideas. Hence, it is elixir to involve various people in company’s important decisions.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of involving in decision-making, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that in some circumstances companies sometime do not need to involve because of security issues due to competitions in the market. For example, some people have connections with other company members, so information can be leaked. Thus, it is wise decision not to involve employees in decision making process.
From what has been discussed above, it can be said that involving employees in decision is prominent although it’s give benefits to company should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'give'.
Suggestion: sometimes give
...ve mind and various skills and they can give sometimes valuable asset to companies by expressi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to company should not be overlooked.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1689.0 1207.87684729 140% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.64882943144 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.28844357447 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518394648829 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 379.143842365 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.7063380905 50.4703680194 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.75 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9166666667 20.9669160288 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.496419864159 0.242375264174 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.229583437205 0.0925447433944 248% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181281367037 0.071462118173 254% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.386014492302 0.151781067708 254% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.314771882284 0.0609392437508 517% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 53.1260098522 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 65.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 59.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.