Should companies need to involve employees in the decision-making process? To what extent do you agree or disagree
The importance of involving employees in the decision-making process, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of employees in the company’s progress has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on companies over the years. It can be said that employees should have rights to participate in company’s decision-making policy, however, it also has some drawbacks as well. This essay will elaborate how engaging employees can lead to a myriad of benefit due to employee’s intellectual skills and experience and how it affects company’s information due to various people involved and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why employees should be engaged in company’s decision making, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that every individual has their own creative mind and various skills and they can give sometimes valuable asset to companies by expressing their ideas. For example, people from business study, experience can give appropriate ideas. Hence, employee’s involvement increase productivity and enhance reputation of company.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of employees ‘involvement in decision-making, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that in some circumstances companies sometime do not need to involve because of security issues due to competitions in the market. For example, some people have connections with other company members, so information can be leaked. Thus, it is wise decision not to involve employees in decision making process.
From what has been discussed above, it can be said that involving employees in decision is prominent although it’s give benefits to company should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'give'.
Suggestion: sometimes give
...ve mind and various skills and they can give sometimes valuable asset to companies by expressi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 10, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to company should not be overlooked.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.82374100719 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39561676864 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557553956835 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.5871311868 50.4703680194 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.181818182 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2727272727 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.322962759234 0.242375264174 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147077028712 0.0925447433944 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0960129486455 0.071462118173 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215724901583 0.151781067708 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565725821415 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 53.1260098522 55% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.77 11.5310837438 145% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.