Should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport?
The effect of building more roads, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of improving the network of public transport has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on masses over the years. It can be said that government should improve the network for public, which can give enormous benefits to everyone. This essay will elaborate how public transport can give a myriad benefit and how building new roads can create plethora problems in society and thus lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why government should improve public transport due to various reasons, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that public transport is more efficient and cost effective to travel, encouraging citizens to use public transport easing of traffic from roads. For example, research conducted by University of Melbourne approved that 70% of traffic reduced by amending in network of transport. Hence, reducing traffic from road can provide improvement in atmosphere, which leads to good health of people.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that building new road is also significant for people as there are numerous reasons for that but the most salient one is that it gives freedom and independence to individuals and reduces traffic congestion due to various roads, For example, research approved that 30% building new roads reduced traffic in Hemingway. Hence, it is elixir to build roads, so people can take advantage to use their own vehicle.
For what has been discussed above, it can be said that the impact of improving public is prominent and the way it controls plethora issues should me well handled.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...traffic congestion due to various roads, For example, research approved that 30% ...
^^
Line 12, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...issues should me well handled.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27208480565 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69393323602 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540636042403 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 92.1704941942 50.4703680194 183% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.2 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3 20.9669160288 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325838291891 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128404700367 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713339563206 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191331552417 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106163704038 0.0609392437508 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.1260098522 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.