Smoking should be banned in all public places. Do you agree or disagree with this statement?
At the outset there are diverse reasons why this subject is considered as vital, but the most conspicuous one steam from the fact when you are taken the drugs that you faced contains nicotine which causes cancer and lung diseases furthermore this can be contributing factor to drugs is a bad habit of passive smoke can develop cancer of lung and mouth. Therefore, negative impact of smoking should be banned in all public place cannot be denied.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that government sell the drugs they earned the big price of money can be addressed with some positive facts as well as there are innumerable facts in favor of that, but the most predominant one stems from the fact that may adversely affect fetus during pregnancy.
The importance of smoking should be banned in all public places can be debated but the fact remains that there were several factors that lead factors to this them and matter. Eventually, according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that I will agree with this statement that smoking should be banned because it causes many diseases it can be predicted that in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 234, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are innumerable facts in favor of that, but the most predominant one stems from ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 31.9359605911 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 1207.87684729 80% => OK
No of words: 201.0 242.827586207 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82089552239 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44056094257 2.71678728327 90% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 139.433497537 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587064676617 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 379.143842365 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 12.6551724138 40% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 20.5024630542 195% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 98.0754811357 50.4703680194 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 193.8 104.977214359 185% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.2 20.9669160288 192% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6 7.25397266985 187% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.349643049294 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.217717745133 0.0925447433944 235% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115393954138 0.071462118173 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.230602439124 0.151781067708 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145269491764 0.0609392437508 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.4 12.6369458128 169% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 53.1260098522 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.9458128079 162% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.56 11.5310837438 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 9.94827586207 181% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.3980295567 173% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.