Recently, the phenomenon of increased nuber of shootings by guns and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many the the matter of viovence is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am incliend to believe that restricted access to guns could be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay..
From a social standpoint, banning the application of guns can provide the society with some noticeable impacts, which are rooted in the fact that both proper ligislations as well as political procedures are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered cultural impacts. Hence, beneficial ramifications of both safety issues and general concerns apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of economy, unlimited access to guns might increase thhe consequences of brutal actions. Moreover, fundametal aspects of prison break relate to this reality that the demerits of shooting pertain to killing innocents. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of attaccking people is correlated negatively with criminal activities. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of banning guns.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly beileve that the benefits of increased number of shootings due to using guns far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of proper decisions prove the significance of better environment, but also pinpoint weaopn implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ated debate. Although contested by many the the matter of viovence is highly beneficial...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ated debate. Although contested by many the the matter of viovence is highly beneficial...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 424, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... will analyze that throughout this essay.. From a social standpoint, banning the ...
^^
Line 2, column 172, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... the fact that both proper ligislations as well as political procedures are inextricably b...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1450.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57692307692 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18545139528 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.669230769231 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6634858892 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.833333333 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146159795422 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.04421465735 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030433951752 0.071462118173 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0810535797972 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0264530740342 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.93 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.