Some people claim that digital age has made us lazier, others claim it has made us more knowledgeable. Discuss both ideas
The importance of digital age, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of internet has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on people over the years. It can be said that it makes people knowledgeable, however, internet has made masses lazy due to over-dependence on technology. This essay will elaborate how it gives information due to easy accessibility, but it creates problem for people due to less physical activity and thus lead to logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why internet has given plethora of information to people with single click, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that it saves precious time and easy accessibility of internet, not only it provides vital information but also helpful in other services. For example, Internet banking, online shopping and study which has become essential for everybody, without internet it cannot possible. Thus, it has become pivotal part of individual’s everyday activities.
Nevertheless, there remain some drawbacks, which can certainly have overwhelmed over the potential influence of digital age, but the most alarming one is rooted in the fact that it reduces the physical activities due to sedentary life style and reasons of many disease. For example, setting all day makes people more obese and lead to further epidemic. Hence, it has detriment effect on people’s life.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the impact of digital age is prominent, although the way it gives a wider range of information should not be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun disease seems to be countable; consider using: 'many diseases'.
Suggestion: many diseases
... to sedentary life style and reasons of many disease. For example, setting all day makes peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1387.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33461538462 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03124508174 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584615384615 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.3127536106 50.4703680194 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.090909091 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6363636364 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.54545454545 7.25397266985 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133100254745 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507848870653 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378562657775 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786615538346 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357550431225 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.