Some people think that keeping pets is good for children. While others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options & give example?
The importance of pets is good for Children which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject of this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in a recent year. In my opinion Some people think that keeping pets is good for children. While others think it is dangerous and unhealthy. Which opinion do you agree with? Discuss both options & give example.
, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my view for favoring both side positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead a logical conclusion.
There are merits of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most important one stems for fact of this trend is that pets are care 24 hours like his shadow . Moreover, children can play with pets because anyone no home than children not feel lonely. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that we can learn many things form pets like honesty. Needless to say, that all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate this argument and which was certainly overwhelm the potential influence is that pets are not understand your language what you says. Hence, it is apparent why are many in against in this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of pets is good for children are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... Discuss both options & give example. , the former proposition appears to be mo...
^
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t pets are care 24 hours like his shadow . Moreover, children can play with pets b...
^^
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'overwhelmed'.
Suggestion: overwhelmed
...e this argument and which was certainly overwhelm the potential influence is that pets ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'understood'.
Suggestion: understood
...otential influence is that pets are not understand your language what you says. Hence, it ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 173, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[4]
Message: The pronoun 'you' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'say'
Suggestion: say
...e not understand your language what you says. Hence, it is apparent why are many in ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 209, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun in seems to be countable; consider using: 'many ins'.
Suggestion: many ins
...you says. Hence, it is apparent why are many in against in this trend. According to t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, look, moreover, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06870229008 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58694589639 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587786259542 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 403.2 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 51.552006508 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 104.977214359 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.375 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365293811956 0.242375264174 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13517777676 0.0925447433944 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.149326767424 0.071462118173 209% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183255533779 0.151781067708 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.211384075574 0.0609392437508 347% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 12.6369458128 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.1260098522 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 55.0591133005 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.94827586207 60% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.