Crime has increasingly become more common these days than ever before. People's opinions differ as to whether or not violence is shown on the TV play a major role. While there are some strong arguments against the setting of violent movies on the TV, I believe that TV programs have nothing to do with the criminal activities that occur the society. This essay will discuss the reasons why TVs are not responsible for the increase in the crime.
There is a myriad of reasons why the crime rate has proliferated in the recent years for which TVs and movies are not responsible. Firstly, lack of proper education among the young people remain the cause of violent crimes. As a consequence, young adults take part in the crime in order to make some quick money. Peter, for example, is in jail because he took part in violent activities. Thus, TVs and movies are absolutely not playing any part in making criminals.
In addition to lack of proper education, drugs and alcohols have a major role to play in making juvenile criminals. The recent reports suggest that the people who consume alcohol prone to make bad activities. In spite of above arguments, some people might promulgate the idea that TVs are reasons for the encouraging criminal activities in the world. However, I do not agree with them as their assertion is invalid. It is predicted that the issues around crime will increase unless the government takes decisive actions.
In conclusion, the dearth of education and drugs hold a significant role in the crime. In my opinion, TV programs and movies have no role to play in the increasing criminal activities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 96, Rule ID: WHETHER[4]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; whether or not; as to whether
...an ever before. Peoples opinions differ as to whether or not violence is shown on the TV play a majo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, so, thus, while, as to, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in my opinion, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85611510791 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59376215004 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532374100719 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 427.5 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6247362857 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.375 104.977214359 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 6.9802955665 14% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 15.0 2.75862068966 544% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264208782076 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795903077035 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0451242501414 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160788656223 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0652447681129 0.0609392437508 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 12.6369458128 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.