Countries should try to produce all the food of the population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this contemporary life , living conditions and food are higher than, so that there are many people believed nations should try to produce all the food for people living in there and import as little food as possible. From my perspective, country produce food can help poor people and improve the life. However, it’s can be reliant on the state budget and financial strain on a country. This essay will examine both sides and support my opinion.
Admittedly, there are some arguments in favor of countries should try to produce all the food for population. First, government produce are believed to equalize living conditions among people regardless of their background family. This produce support, presumably tends not only to increase the overall health rate of lower-income people but also to mitigate diseases and their feeling of inferiority, which promotes an egalitarian society. Second, government donating all food would probably result in a higher supply of highly qualified workers, which benefits society in the long run. Moreover , in these days, more and more people spread their own country’s food to national friendships, this is one of the best way to explore traditional, culture and attract many people to visit and try food. In fact, it is acknowledged that food and knowledgeable human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological in any nations.
Nevertheless, offering all people food as little as possible would be far more disadvantages significant than the minor benefits once country produce all food for population. First, country produce food would likely correspond with a tremendous financial strain on a country. Generating no income from consume costumer, company could become over-reliant on the state budget for funding, meaning that there would be less input to develop other important areas such as healthcare system and transport infrastructure. Second, all people have food from government’ produce would tempt many people including they are not the person living in poverty or show no interest to spread best items to other country or foreign, thereby adding great burden for staff and company and potentially wasting time that government should focus on education or improve rural areas have problem by weather such as storms or rain. It, instead, would be a more viable produce option if the resources were focused on supporting yet gifted people.
In conclusion, despite the long-term of government produce more food for population to help them improve many part in that day. Meanwhile, it’s likely more disadvantages than government should be face when do that. In my opinion, government should consider clearly before chosen the way to solve or they can support a little in special events.
- The graph show the price of bananas in 4 different countries from 1996 to 2004 67
- The best way to procedure a happier society is to ensure that there are only smaller differences between the richest and the poorest member To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar chart give information about people living in Australia and living outside Australia in urban rural and countryside from 1995 to 2010 67
- The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 67
- Some people believe that a country will benefit greatly if its students study abroad To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 26, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
In this contemporary life , living conditions and food are higher t...
^^
Line 2, column 597, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...nefits society in the long run. Moreover , in these days, more and more people spr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, while, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2331.0 1615.20841683 144% => OK
No of words: 439.0 315.596192385 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30979498861 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.20363070211 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77763431533 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 233.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530751708428 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 723.6 506.74238477 143% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.3715582413 49.4020404114 157% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.5 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3888888889 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.323118001962 0.244688304435 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111311015932 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098292692683 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212407799166 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039037526787 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.